Huh any info about why they’ve requested this? The article doesn’t go into very much detail
this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Interesting Global News
2613 readers
345 users here now
What is global news?
Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media posts
Avoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
- [email protected] - International and local legal news.
- [email protected] - Technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
- [email protected] - Interesting articles, projects, and research that doesn't fit the definition of news.
- [email protected] - News and information from Europe.
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
In a statement, AstraZeneca said the decision was made because there is now a variety of newer vaccines available that have been adapted to target Covid-19 variants. This had led to a decline in demand for the AstraZeneca vaccine, which is no longer being manufactured or supplied.
But then why pull authorisation?
Is this some kind of patent thing where they "destroy" it before it becomes public domain?
They don’t want people using an ineffective product (new strains) just because they have surplus of it that then hurts their public image
Or they’d like countries that have a reserve be forced to abandon that supply and buy fresh stock.
Well, the virus mutating took care of that for them.
They recently admitted in court filing that their VAX does in fact have side effects. Presumably related to this.
They also covered these risks when bringing VAX to market.
We really need to find who did this and serve them some rope.
If you're going to advocate murdering people, you could at least make a token effort to be factually correct about why.
None of your anti-vax, end of the world conspiracies came true, the date just keeps getting pushed further out. It's time to shake off your cult programming, apologise to your family and move on with your life -- something millions of people don't get to do because of anti-vax idiocy.
Corporation literally engaged in criminal misconduct to get drug approved for the market. But you are here defending their conduct?
Fucking bootlickers, learn to think for yourself.
Fucking bootlickers, learn to think for yourself.
I can't, my brain is controlled by 4G now.
Does it matter what they admit? These companies always wait for many years to admit anything. By then the damage to people is done.
Of course one could argue that if everyone would vaccinate, almost everyone would be better off, except people with side effects. But I can absolutely understand why people don't want to risk being that person getting side effects. There is no help to be had if you are that person.
If they admit in court then yes, it will have legal consequences as we see here. They are rushing to reduce their litigation risk going forward. Likely bribing politician and health officials in various markets as we speak.
Will they be punished for misconduct? We know that these people can kill whistleblowers and jack shit anyone will do about it....