this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
33 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9639 readers
353 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We all know America has a massive problem with sprawl and mandatory parking minimums, however there does seem to be a trend of easing these arbitrary minimums. With that said, we still have massive parking lots with nothing happening.

What is preventing that land from being leased and turned into solar farms? Or for that matter - active parking lots? Why not build raised structure to put solar farms over top of parking lots - not just here in the us - but everywhere?

Pro being ... Energy? Shade for cars? Something to look at other parking lots?

Cons being... Safety? Shady people in shady places? Something to look at other than solar farms?

I know there are articles on this - but just wanted to hear y'all's thoughts on it since it's been rattling in my head for a minute.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Adding solar panels for parking lots that are needed, like the ones at the aiports, is good. But, we should get rid of as many huge parking lots in the cities as we can

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well, yes, parking lots should be built up not out. I'm not so much talking about cities more so like suburban Walmarts parking lots

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Those should also get removed, honestly

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

We have a bunch of that around my area too. The first was actually a high school. I think it was some sort of proof of concept thing. I bunch of colleges have that now so I assume there is some sort of grant.

There is a college on the coast that is a converted military base with massive amounts of unused/parking space. They added a huge ammonts of solar to power a significant portion of the campus.

And everything I just said was at least 15 years ago. It works pretty well.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They're doing something like that in France - all new and existing car parks with space for more than 80 cars have to have solar panels https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/nov/09/france-to-require-all-large-car-parks-to-be-covered-by-solar-panels

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Oh this is cool - thank you for sharing

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Cost is the only reason. It would be very expensive to build out solar shade for all the parking spaces, even with the money making benefits.

The reason is that most of these parking lots are in retail spaces. These spaces often use a "triple net" lease that makes the tenant responsible for power costs, not the land owner.

The land owner doesnt pay any power bills, so they don't care about long term utility savings, and the tenants cant justify a huge upfront cost that will save them money on power bills, but one they wont own and one they won't benefit financially from if they leave that particular retail space.

In order for this to happen consistently, it would need to be a legal requirement. Any law passed to do it would have immense amounts of monied opposition from rich land owners.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

The land owner doesnt pay any power bills, so they don’t care about long term utility savings, and the tenants cant justify a huge upfront cost that will save them money on power bills, but one they wont own and one they won’t benefit financially from if they leave that particular retail space.

This is the same reason most rental houses don't have solar panels.

Although I could see a future where panels are so cheap that people just add them whenever there is a major renovation or new build. It's already close to that point in Australia.