this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
105 points (98.2% liked)

Memes

4028 readers
1 users here now

Good memes, bad memes, unite towards a united front.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago

Yeah Europe should be terrified but not of Putin

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Something something "playing both sides," something something, "come out on top."

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

This is the live action Inventing Reality.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago

So let's just ask Mr. Putin what he would do in a desperate situation and then do exactly that. The solution is both clever and for some reason incredibly clever.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago

Continuing their long tradition of asking "Why won't Russia admit they're losing??"

[–] [email protected] 36 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I stg they publish both versions of this every week. Wild how half the coverage is "it's so over we are so back"

[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago

It's so Joever

We're so Barack

[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The quote

In the United States, for over a hundred years, the ruling interests tirelessly propagated anticommunism among the populace, until it became more like a religious orthodoxy than a political analysis. During the Cold War, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime’s atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn’t go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them. If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.

-- Michael Parenti, Blackshirts And Reds

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the admins of this instance if you have any questions or concerns.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

That's a damn fine bot you got there