Imagine if F1 did something similar to soccer (but with a few changes): There's a list of candidates that fulfil the requisites, and they're are given a score depending on how good their proposal is.

If a team finishes 2 years in a row in the last position (or 3 non-consecutive times in the last 5 years), it's demoted to candidate again and exits the sport, and the candidate with the better candidacy enters the sport, where they have 2 years to try to improve and get out of the last position.

So far, Williams and Haas have been swapping the last position, and one of them could've been thrown out already. I particularly disliked Gene Haas "I don't care if I finish last, it works for me" attitude, it's just mediocrity, and not good for the sport, specially if there's a good candidate waiting.

Could something like this work?

I get increasing the anti dilution fund. The teams which stood by F1 during the rough times deserve that. What I don't understand is limiting to 10 teams. Sporting factors should supercede monetary factors. I see a court case being filed and big mess if this is agreed upon

And to think I still think that the ideal is 30 or 31 cars competing for 26 grid slots

Idiots

Gentrified sport.

I wonder if anyone in charge even cares about competitive racing, or if it's just empty PR designed to increase value.

Even the figure heads shill for FOM / FIA / Liberty instead of providing real insight and criticism. It's just getting to be too much.

This has really killed my interest in F1. Why watch when everything is set in stone.

This is the important news, not the Hamilton rumor. They want to ban Andretti forever.

F1/FiA dying to get in on enshittification.