this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
34 points (94.7% liked)

Privacy

32947 readers
516 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So, I had an idea for an Invidious alternative that would be pretty difficult for YouTube to block. Basically, YouTube can block instances because it is really easy to detect which IP is making a lot of requests. But what if everyone using Invidious were an instance? Like, if one person wants to watch a video, they would get it from a random person using this software. I don't really know how it would be done—if it would be something like torrents, which have a direct connection, or if it would go through some server in the middle. This is just a suggestion; I don't really know how I would implement it. But if it can be done and someone wants to do it, it would be great.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

I've been running Piped for over a year. Its been fine, though I have had some bobbles like it had a buggy Newpipe update that took it down for a day.

I run it on docker and set up watchtower labels so its kept right up to date since I think YT keeps messing with Newpipes access.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

Bad actors might only feed on such a networks without seeding, so you will need some kind of good actor reward in your proposed system.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

this sounds like decentralized anon network to me, like i2p... but with access to the clearnet. https://geti2p.net/en/

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

GrayJay works fine for me

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Some YouTube clients allow "local extraction" (FreeTube and LibreTube, to name a couple), which sidesteps the need for an instance altogether. However, that then means either 1. You use a VPN to hide your IP from YouTube and risk getting the VPN server IP banned or 2. You don't use a VPN, expose your IP to YouTube, and have a (small) chance of banning your own IP.

The best alternative would be to remove YouTube altogether and switch to something like PeerTube or Odysee, but you can't expect all your favorite creators to be there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

What about to upload these creators videos to PeerTube? Maybe just the best ones, like a videoarchive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I use FreeTube, but it also depends on Invidious instances. If YT blocks the instance also Freetube wouldn't work, it show the Thumbnail, but on't play the Video.. My workarround is using the SMplayer as extern player, which almost works, when FreeTube can't.

But I think sooner or later there are not longer YT Front-ends, because Google kill them all, the only thing is to use an YT alternative, instead of an Front-end. The only which I know which can be an alternative in the future is Odysee, it depends on the creators which want to monetize their work, without all the Google crap, clickbaits, trackers and ads. Odysee permits to monetize in a more fair and clean way.

Until now is watching YT with a good adblocker, watch Videos embedded or search the Video with Andisearch y watch it there sandboxed in the search results.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

You don't need an Invidious instance to back FreeTube. You can set it to local mode to just talk to YouTube from your IP, or to operate through a proxy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

I know, but it don't change that the time of watching YT without tricks, disinfectant and gum gloves has gone. It needs alternatives for the same reason we use Lemmy or Mastoon instead of Fakebook, X, Reddit....

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

In the long term a switch wood be good, yes. But I am impressed by youtubes ability to load 10+ year old videos without problems, and I am afraid this is only possible because of their immense scale.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Kinda sounds like you're describing Tor

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Thinking about it, this really looks similar

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

I think this is absolutely doable to problem is you need to have enough users on all the time to make this sort of thing work soa doptionn is important. You could probably piggy back off existing open source projects to get it going.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

So, kinda like a cross between FreeTube and Torrent? Interesting idea...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do I understand correctly, what you mean is that there is an Invidious instance to which two users are connected. User A sends request to Invidious to get a video, Invidious forwards it to user B, user B downloads the video and sends it back to user A?

Sounds a lot like Tor or maybe I am missing something?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Yes, it's basically like it, but i don't think it would be possible just from a web browser