this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
492 points (93.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

9677 readers
41 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (19 children)

@owen @heatofignition @mondoman712 Here's the timetable for the Sydney Northwest Metro: https://transportnsw.info/documents/timetables/93-M-Sydney-Metro-North-West-20230929.pdf

It has a service every four minutes during the morning and evening peak.

I've attached a screenshot from Google Maps showing what's typical 8am morning commute would look like from Rouse Hill to Macquarie University and the Macquarie Park business precinct.

It's typically 40 minutes by car. You have to have your hands on the wheel. You're stuck in traffic. That's if you pay $9.56 or $14.13 for a toll road, which is a bit quicker.

Or you can take the Metro.

Trains run every four minutes during the morning peak, so you can turn up and go. It's a modern service with driverless trains and platform-screen doors.

It takes 32 minutes — so it's the faster option. And you can do other things during your commute.

(I've attached a screenshot, please note you might need to see the original post to view it.)

The train is the faster and more convenient option.

Why wouldn't you take the Metro?

This isn't because the state government has done anything to hobble road driving.

It's because the NSW State Government has invested in building a good quality, frequent Metro service to the northwestern suburbs.

The Metro has been a catalyst for building a number of transit-oriented developments at each of the stations. For the people living in those apartments, there's a clear winner.

The problem is that for around 70 years after WW2, governments have zoned whole suburbs for low-density residential.

These car-dependent suburbs, cars were the only viable option for getting to work, school, or shopping. By design.

At best, there's an often unreliable bus that runs every 20 minutes during the peak. And that's it.

At least in Australia, they tend to be on the outer fringes of the major metropolitan areas. Wealthier people with a choice tend to prefer inner-urban areas with better public transport.

If you just hit people in these areas with taxes and fines without a compelling alternative, and you're effectively levelling a poor tax.

Give people access to good quality public transport — and yes it can be faster than being stuck in traffic — and they'll choose it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (18 children)

@ajsadauskas @heatofignition @mondoman712

Everyone understands that transit is terrible in car dependent suburbs. Low gas prices are a direct cause of that. Yes, if you leave from a station and go to another station, it might be faster than driving.

It's a choice to focus on how high gas prices might negatively impact suburban commuters -- who largely own their homes and can afford to operate a private vehicle -- rather people who can't own a car and are negatively impacted by low gas prices.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (17 children)

@ajsadauskas @heatofignition @mondoman712

It also looks like the council plan for the Rouse Hills Shire indicates an 80% mode share for private vehicles. The single train station to downtown and infrequent buses are not getting people out of cars.

https://www.thehills.nsw.gov.au/files/sharedassets/public/ecm-website-documents/page-documents/building/plans-guidelines/integrated_transport_and_land_use_strategy.pdf

Additionally, it looks like despite transit investments the metro is predicted to still see a 67% car mode share by 2031

https://www.infrastructureaustralia.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-08/Transport%20Modelling%20Report%20for%20Sydney.pdf

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

@ajsadauskas @heatofignition @mondoman712

And your example is using a route with a toll! That is an example of the government hobbling driving.

I'm not saying we shouldn't build transit. Or that it even should be a lower priority. I'm simply saying we should *also* raise the cost of driving because that impacts a lot of decisions, including the trade-off between using transit and driving as you demonstrated with your example.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

@owen @heatofignition @mondoman712 The fastest alternative route is the M2 Hills Motorway, which was built as a tollway in 1997, in addition to all the existing roads in the area: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M2_Hills_Motorway

Building a new motorway isn't hobbling congestion, it's enabling it.

It was supposed to relieve congestion to northwest Sydney.

Well, there's still traffic jams.

And even compared to a completely grade-separated dual carriageway six-lane motorway, the Metro is *still* faster during peak hour.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)