this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
4 points (75.0% liked)

Memes

45579 readers
1230 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
4
6÷2(1+2) (programming.dev)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

https://zeta.one/viral-math/

I wrote a (very long) blog post about those viral math problems and am looking for feedback, especially from people who are not convinced that the problem is ambiguous.

It's about a 30min read so thank you in advance if you really take the time to read it, but I think it's worth it if you joined such discussions in the past, but I'm probably biased because I wrote it :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (38 children)

I disagree. Without explicit direction on OOO we have to follow the operators in order.

The parentheses go first. 1+2=3

Then we have 6 ÷2 ×3

Without parentheses around (2×3) we can't do that first. So OOO would be left to right. 9.

In other words, as an engineer with half a PhD, I don't buy strong juxtaposition. That sounds more like laziness than math.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

as a half PhD

Go read the article, it's about you

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago

Go read the article, it’s about you

The article is wrong dotnet.social/@SmartmanApps/110897908266416158

load more comments (36 replies)