this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
7 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

17884 readers
32 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Apple has decided to remove Progressive web apps from iOS in EU. If you have a business in the EU or serve EU users via Web App/PWA, we must hear from you in the next 48 hours!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (28 children)

They’re removing pwa from the desktop, not stopping them from functioning entirely.

You can still have a cobbled together insecure piece of trash but you gotta go to its url in the browser instead of clicking the app.

Hell, you can still have a shortcut to it on the desktop.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (9 children)

How is it more insecure than a website?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (8 children)

How is a piece of software that runs in the browser instead of directly in the os, uses a million little libraries and became popular as a way to avoid scrutiny on the distribution platform less secure than a website?

Let’s assume you have great answers for all that and I’m made to look like a fool: when someone goes to a website, their guard is up. When they click on an app their guard is down.

If nothing else pwas bypass user distrust of weird crap on the internet and that’s a bad thing

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

@bloodfart @kilgore_trout
"How is a piece of software that runs in the browser instead of directly in the os... less secure than a website?"

The question answered itself 😂

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

@bloodfart @kilgore_trout

"WebKit's sandbox profile on iOS is orders of magnitude more stringent than the sandbox for native iOS apps." 😁 direct quote from Apple

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/62277271d3bf7f158779fe39/Apple_11.3.22.pdf

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)