this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
281 points (93.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

32481 readers
232 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (7 children)

I've only had to implement equality in C# but that didn't seem that hard of a problem. you just expand the operator = function

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (4 children)

It's not hard, just if you're doing it for a struct with a lot of fields it's a lot of boilerplate

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

My IDE can do that for me. And it was able to do that pre AI boom. Yes, the code ends up more verbose, but I just collapse it.

So from a modern dev UX perspective, this shouldn't be a major difference.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago

What if youre working with library types? The problem is not not you compare a bunch of fields but that the implementation on those members is most likely bad.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)