Science

3180 readers

2 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Question: What mineral/compound do modern arthropods use for their eyes (vs. Trilobites with their calcite lenses)? (lemmy.ca)

submitted 7 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I was searching online for quite a while this evening, chasing a half-remembered bit of trivia, that trilobites were supposedly unique in their use of calcite for their lenses, composing the ommatidia of their compound eyes.

It must be so obvious to scientists in the field of studying insects that they never mention it in their papers...

So, what compound(s) do modern arthropods use in their compound eyes. If it isn't calcite, what do modern 'bugs' use?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

Chitin.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (3 children)

Ah! So the same as the rest of their hard parts, I suppose. I suspected as much, but couldn't seem to find any paper that explicitly stated this.

Thank you!

In regards to use of calcite vs. chitin: doing a quick search: https://www.ualberta.ca/en/earth-sciences/facilities/collections-and-museums/treasury-of-trilobites/index.html

Were trilobites also unique in using calcite in addition to chitin in their exoskeleton? Do any extant arthropods use calcite in any significant way?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

From my searching, it would seem that trilobites used calcite to reinforce their hard parts as well. Crustaceans have amorphous calcium carbonate reinforced exoskeletons through mineralization, but no calcite land arthropods do not seem to have this mineralization tho.

I'm no expert. Just like using Google Scholar to answer questions I find interesting.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

What I find interesting, then, is what advantage the trilobites may have gained by using a basic mineral for the lenses vs. organic chitin. Chitin must have a transparent form in order to function for the eyes in modern creatures? Hmm.

I read in one paper that trilobites may have actually formed some kind of dual-layer in their lenses to compensate for the double-refraction property of calcite.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago

Seems to be easier focusing with the calcite as well as durability in the scratchy sand environment.

Additionally, more derived/later species had aspherical lenses to compensate for the spherical aberration and dual layer organic→calcite lenses to allow for more of a refractive gradient to counteract the double imaging of calcite alone.

Modern arthropods probably done use it on land because of an inability to accumulate it in an efficient manner. Water arthropods like crustaceans probably done because it's metabolically expensive to do these things when chitin alone can make for useful eyes.

Evolution is more of a "good enough" kinda situation.