this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
47 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

963 readers
54 users here now

A tech news sub for communists

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I'm no aerospace engineer but supersonic flight, no matter how technologically advanced we become, will always remain incredibly fuel inefficient because of fundamental laws of fluid dynamics. A supersonic aircraft would likely remain a niche market, never replacing our current transonic passenger aircraft. I'm betting the tickets would be prohibitively expensive who isn't in the top 1% or paid for by a government agency.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Apparently, there have been some ideas on how to make efficient hypersonic vehicles. The vehicle could be operating in the upper atmosphere where there's less drag. It would basically be an inherently long haul vehicle where you'd go up do most of the trip up high, and then come back down.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The upper atmosphere would probably have less drag, but the lower speed of sound at high altitudes would exacerbate the issues of supersonic flight and require specialized, expensive aircraft. It may become more efficient, but I still see it as mostly a niche market.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Initially for sure, but I imagine as with any tech once it gets established, the costs will come down to make it more broadly applicable.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)