this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

BestOfLemmy

7194 readers
2 users here now

Manual curation of great Lemmy discussions and threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

third party voters are not working to "split the vote", they are voting for their preferred candidate.

also known as "voting" in healthy democracies.

and no, a vote for a different candidate is not a vote for Trump, that is fundamentally inaccurate fear-based alarmism.

it's okay that you're afraid, but that's no reason to dismantle democracy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

third party voters are not working to "split the vote", they are voting for their preferred candidate.

Unfortunately with the electoral college, it is splitting the vote. Without ranked choose voting, voting for anyone other than a D or an R is literally throwing your vote away.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

No, they aren't.

they're living and voting according to their principles.

The system is broken, but that doesn't mean you have to abandon your principles.

their vote is as valid as any other.

it may be less effective because of the adequated US electoral system, but any vote itself is as valid as any other.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

To quote DBZa's Android 16:

"But there you stand, the good man, doing nothing. And while evil triumphs, and your rigid pacifism crumbles into blood-stained dust, the only victory afforded to you is that you stuck true to your guns."

Life isn't some black and white fair tale story where if you stick to your guns hard enough everything will turn out ok. Sometimes you have to abandon your principles to protect them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

"...doing nothing"

voting is literally the political opposite of doing nothing.

"your rigid pacifism crumbles into blood-stained dust,"

this quote is irrelevant; it is a wildly inaccurate analogy for actively voting.

"Sometimes you have to abandon your principles to protect them."

pffffff hAHaha sorry Chamberlain, but especially in politics, self-righteous groveling submission isn't as honorable or as effective as the fearful snakes hissing in your ear assure you it is.

load more comments (2 replies)