this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
772 points (96.0% liked)

196

16503 readers
1960 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (8 children)

Sure, let's "regulate" capitalism by outlawing absentee ownership of land and capital.

I would say that wouldn't be capitalism anymore, but you can call it what you want.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I am an anti-capitalist.

To get rid of capitalism, you don't have to abolish absentee ownership of capital. A worker coop can lease capital from third parties and remain a non-capitalist democratic worker coop. Abolishing capitalism just requires abolishing the employment contract and common ownership of land and natural resources. Without the employment contract, everyone is either individually or jointly self-employed, so every firm is a worker coop

@196

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I prefer mutualism to Georgism, but I prefer either to capitalism. ¯\(ツ)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I am a mutualist as well. I just use the term, economic democracy as David Ellerman calls it, instead because mutualism doesn't seem as clear. Also, mutualism has anarchist connotations, which I am sympathetic to, but I believe the movement to abolish capitalism should be broader than anarchism.

In other words,

anarchist economic democracy = mutualism

@196

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, that's fair. I think it's important to promote anarchism too, but it is a harder sell.

Overall, I think we just need to remind people that political and economic hierarchies are mutually reinforcing, and keep pushing things in a libertarian-ish direction.

load more comments (4 replies)