this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
44 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

966 readers
5 users here now

A tech news sub for communists

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I mean this one could actually be at a big cost. It would take a lot of effort to switch the world's digital systems to be fully quantum secure, but this situation was inevitable either way.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There's never going to be a such thing as quantum secure. Cryptography is an arms race. All we can really do is make the maths more complicated and take longer; all attackers can do is try to reduce the time it takes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The best defence is always going to be being unknown.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

As a matter of opsec, I mostly agree. But security is always best achieved in layers (and to a degree, redundancy). People running any CIA/NSA-backdoored operating system are compromised before even thinking about being discrete.

Always assume you will be surveilled. Always assume you will be caught. Ultimately it's strong encryption and total rejection of closed-source software that gives you the best defense against the pigs.