this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
108 points (100.0% liked)

Programming

17028 readers
244 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The really interesting part is IMO this one:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 hours ago (5 children)

Definitely agree with tech debt. Seems like nobody except me cares about improving things, which is surprising given this survey!

Also definitely agree about reliability of tools/systems, but again it feels like it's just me that cares about robustness - everyone else is very happy to churn out hacky Bash scripts, dynamically typed Python and regexes with abandon.

Either you're all a bunch of hypocrites or the SO survey is quite a biased sample!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Consider that to go on a site specifically for programming questions and then take a survey about it, you have to be the kind of person that cares about getting their code "right". The majority of programmers I've met would only go there to copy-paste a quick answer, and those people have all moved to asking chat-gpt for code now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

Yep, the ones who are doing some kind of input on stack overflow (even just a survey) are way beyond the “let’s keep everything the same because to get rid of tech debt sounds like a bunch of work” camp.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)