this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
255 points (97.8% liked)

RetroGaming

19568 readers
367 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Introducing Dungeons of Infinity

A talented individual known as Justin Bohemier has transformed the classic Super Nintendo hit, A Link to the Past, into a procedurally-generated roguelike dungeon crawler. Over four years in development using Gamemaker Studio with the original assets, the game 'Dungeons of Infinity' aims to offer a new and challenging experience for fans.

Key Features:

  • Procedural Generation - Each playthrough offers unique layouts, enemies, and items.
  • Link's Nemesis Aghanim - The ultimate challenge lies in encountering Link's arch-enemy, Aghanim. Survival depends on navigating the dungeons until reaching this final boss.

The creator emphasizes that no continues or extra lives are available, adding to the game’s difficulty curve.


What do you think about applying roguelike elements to classic games like 'A Link to the Past'? Have you encountered similar fan projects?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 months ago (32 children)

Do I seriously need to sign up on discord to get this?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (12 children)

Yeah, I was annoyed by that as well, but if you like a link to the past, it’s worth it.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I disagree. Discord asked for my phone number when I tried to sign up, probably because I used a throwaway mail address and it detected that. No thanks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Discord server owners can choose to have their members require account verification before joining as an anti-bot measure.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)