United Kingdom

4138 readers

47 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Boy, 15, is first person charged with riot over recent English disorder (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A 15-year-old boy has become the first person to be charged with riot over the recent disorder that swept towns and cities across England.

Almost all those involved have so far been charged with violent disorder, which carries a shorter maximum sentence than the offence of rioting. On Wednesday a judge, the recorder of Hull, suggested that prosecutors should consider the riot charge for people alleged to have played a central role in the disorder.

On Thursday the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said that a 15-year-old boy had been charged with riot after disorder in Sunderland. It said more riot charges would follow.

The riot charge carries a maximum sentence of 10 years, whereas for violent disorder the maximum is five years. The boy’s defence lawyer, Chris Wilson, told a hearing that the new charge may have “far wider repercussions”.

The district judge Zoe Passfield adjourned his case for two weeks as she said the new charge must have come as a “surprise” to him. She told the teenager: “The prosecution now want to bring a further charge of riot.

“It is an unusual situation when a new charge is brought after the person has pleaded guilty and it opens up complications that I and the lawyers need to consider carefully.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (9 children)

So they will be going after the groomers next, right? Right?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Interesting downvotes.

So people want the adults that radicalized these kids to get off with no punishment?

That's a hot take I didn't expect from here!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I didn't see it earlier but I'd have assumed this was saying the police should be chasing Rotherham child abusers not wasting time on riots.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

To me when someone says groomers, it puts my mind to tackling the child abusers, or anti-lgbt people accusing people of the same.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Interesting. Edited my 1st comment for clarity, hopefully.

load more comments (7 replies)