Late Stage Capitalism

5615 readers

1 users here now

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Disney argues it was legal to kill a doctor because she had a Disney+ trial once (wdwnt.com)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Is Disney arguing this should go to binding arbitration and that they are not at fault for the death, or are they arguing that it is legal for them to kill people whose families had Disney+ trials?

It's fine to have your own strong opinion on this case, but you can't have your own facts.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Is it likely that there will be legal consequences for Disney if it went to arbitration? I'm guessing if they're pushing for arbitration, they probably know it means they'll get away with it - so granting arbitration is essentially the same as legally sanctioning their actions or negligence.

load more comments (1 replies)