this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
72 points (95.0% liked)

Programming

17432 readers
219 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 36 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

Using a tool like this to hide sections of code presented for review places a lot of trust in the automation. If Mallory were to discover a blind spot in the semantic diff logic, she could slip in a small change for eventual use in an exploit, and it would never be seen by another human.

For example, consider this part of the exploit used in the recent xz backdoor. In case you don't see the problem, here's the fix.

Rather than hiding code from review, if a tool figured out a way to use semantic understanding to highlight code that might be overlooked by a human (and should therefore be reviewed more carefully), it could conceivably help find such things.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

I don't have an opinion on the topic but I see a blind spot in your argument, so I have to be that kind of person ... ๐Ÿฅบ

One could use the exact same example to argue that humans are very bad at parsing code (especially if whitespace kicks in). In that regard a tool that allows them to reason on a standardized representation of the AST can be a protection against a whole class of attacks.

[โ€“] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

That's not a blind spot in my comment. See my final paragraph.

It's only one sentence. Maybe it was easy to miss. :)

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Oh yeah, so I'm that other kind of guy ๐Ÿฅบ

I kinda like your idea, but I think it can be difficult to detect some confusing situations. I think it would be a better idea, but I don't think it's a full replacement.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)