this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
32 points (94.4% liked)
Electric Vehicles
3123 readers
493 users here now
A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.
Rules
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No self-promotion
- No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
- No trolling
- Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is great news. The adoption of ev’s will only occur when it is economically advantageous. Capitalism prevents it from playing out any other way.
If a company like Sysco has calculated that it is in their best interest to move to ev’s, the rest will follow.
Probably no more than 10 years before the majority of freight trucks are ev’s.
Its economically advantageous for Sysco because they are in the business of short haul freight. Batteries have plenty of power to do daily deliveries from warehouses to customers, or suppliers to warehouses.
Long haul trucks are not feasible with battery electric trucks, which is why both freightliner and pieterbuilt's ev offerings are just short haul trucks with a day cab.
Absolutely correct. The sheer weight of the batteries needed for long haul trucking would be entirely self defeating. Not to mention the time needed to charge then
I wonder if pantograph trucks will be a widespread strategy to electrify long haul trucking?
Not a chance. Trains make infinitely more sense at that point.
So, trains between major cities, and short haul trucking to small cities and within cities? Sounds like a reasonable plan.
Do we have enough trains and tracks to replace the current global long haul trucking fleet, or will we need to build more?
Rail still exists in a lot of the US, and around the world. It's also less expensive to build and maintain new rail compared to highway lanes. And that's before you include the externalities like deaths from brake dust, pollution from rubber dust, increased traffic, traffic fatalities, road delays, and so on.
Trains make more sense for long haul freight generally. Long haul trucking exists because governments heavily subsidize the infrastructure they run on.
The future is rarely people doing what makes sense.
That's why we're still warming the planet at a damning rate, yes.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
pantograph trucks
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.