this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

worldnews

1797 readers
1 users here now

Welcome! This community is constantly upgrading and is a current work in progress. Please stay tuned.

/c/[email protected] strives for high-quality standards on the latest world events.

The basis of these standards comes from the MBFC, which uses an aggregate of methodologies, including the IFCN and World Freedom Indices, to rate the Bias and Factual Reporting of News.

These are non-profit organisations with full transparency of their funding and structure. Likewise, this community is also transparent – Please feel free to question its staff and the overall content of this community.


Does your post fit the standards? Check this thread!



Rules:


Disallowed submissions

Commenters will receive one public warning with only one strike if violating any of the following rules:

Thank you.

todo list:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (9 children)

You MUST make solutions that appeal to enough people to have a coalition. Refusal to negotiate on anything, and taking an all-or-nothing approach is what will fuck us all.

Republicans have been strategic; it's taken them nearly 40 years of work, but they've managed to throw out Roe v. Wade. They took a lot of small nibbles over time, fought the battle on a lot of fronts, and by dog, they eventually won. They're also fighting this on public education, religion, and a hundred other fronts, and because they're able to largely form working coalitions, they're winning. (This latest House, with the Freedom Caucus, has been an exception rather than the rule.) The left needs to fucking learn this lesson, instead of each faction not giving a goddamned inch and fighting to the bitter end over everything. Fracturing and circular firing squads aren't helping the left, they only help the right.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (8 children)

Lol ur so wrong and mad. Good solutions appeal to people when implemented- If the rich lived in fear, or better yet were eliminated -life WOULD be better for the rest of us. You sound like a steamroller pacifist.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

History is replete with examples of individuals who believed they could create a utopia by killing enough people. Of them, you're not the most enlightened, just the latest.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Billionaires shouldn't exist. They profit off death. Are you getting paid to argue for their lives?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think your primary motivation is violence, not progress. I don't need to be a shill to recognize that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

No, thats the billionaires you're thinking of again. And the conditions which uphold your likely quite cozy, insulated life and opinions.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)