this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Science
13013 readers
2 users here now
Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
More vague FUD, not actual criticism of the content. You keep making baseless arguments and expect people to take you seriously. It's always hilarious to watch internet illiterate people behave online.
The reality of the situation is that I posted a link to a factually accurate article that lists primary sources from credible institutions. You haven't even bother acknowledging this fact in all your ranting while bleating about some supposed "misinformation".
I could almost applaud the effort you’re exerting in defending such a questionable looking website if it wasn’t so sad.
Next time post the original sources, you post like a grandparent emails. It’s the equivalent of emails with a bunch of “fwd…” embedded them.
If you think posting a shady website and asking people to “please click the credible links in this unreliable ‘news’ website” is a good argument… buddy, you’re more of an idiot than I thought.
I love how you exude peak liberalism here focusing entirely on the looks as opposed to substance. 🤡
Again, more lack of creativity on your part 🥱. Maybe go take an improv class. It might help your creativity, it would also do you some good to get out of the house for a bit.
I don't need to be creative to call out your bullshit. All you've done here is attack the site without any substance and exposed yourself as a troll. That's it. Absolutely hilarious that you're still going at it for a second day. I guess you've got nothing better to do with your time. 😂