this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
2 points (75.0% liked)

Memes

3975 readers
75 users here now

Good memes, bad memes, unite towards a united front.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (50 children)

Yes he was:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Purge

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulag

These Lenin/Stalin worship posts are shameful. You are being as big of a fool as neonazis. Instead of wasting time with memes learn history and stop worship idiots.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Gulags were prisons. And they were, in many ways, more humane and rehabilitation-focused than any Western prisons. This is scratching the surface of the issue.

The real issue is you not bothering to fathom that the capitalists will fight tooth and nail, including psychologically, to stop the rise of the singular ideology that threatens their millenia of power.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I understand that there is a mountain of propaganda convincing you that Stalin was evil, but literally name one thing supposedly wrong witb LENIN. Nothing, not even the usual CIA and Nazis could be bothered to make up stories about him.

You are operating under the assumption of, "well, all the people around me say these people are evil, so, they must be!"

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

In case people are still reading this thread, Kronstadt were Whites (not the skin kind, the White army). Some at Kronstadt called themselves anarchists but the group otherwise committed pogroms and was fighting for the White army. Not that OP really cared, all he wanted was to attribute something to Lenin to criticize him for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What I have to say is to point you towards the Dessalines git post and ask you to find the issues with his sources or his statements wikipedia is not an unbiased or in depth source, look at the primary sources of your information who they were how they got that information. Like Dessalines looked at it and countered it with good sources now you are pointing back at the target of the Dessalines criticism without even acknowledging the criticism. I have no problems with disagreement, as long as its in good faith but you glossing over and huge documentation of criticism and just repeating your point cause Wikipedia says so does not look like good faith

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This appears to be another… Wikipedia link?

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (44 replies)