PC Gaming

8540 readers

639 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Overwatch 2 Devs Fear Story Missions Have Been Canceled (kotaku.com)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 46 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (14 children)

Oh, you mean the entire "reason they HAD to make overwatch 2"?

And yes, I know that it was actually to get people to rebuy skins that they already had and heroes that they already had

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (9 children)

OW2 absolutely deserves criticism but that is factually incorrect - if you had OW1, all your stuff carried over. You didn't have to pay for anything you had previously

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What is factually correct is that they promised no map or hero would ever be paid content when ow1 launched. Ow2 allowed them to eat their words and put new heroes behind a paywall.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If we're going for complete accuracy, that's not totally true either. You can unlock every hero through (free) challenges or pay to unlock them immediately.

Before I get called an OW2 fanboy: I loved OW1 and liked OW2 enough to play it for a few weeks but quit when they announced the PvE changes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

You can unlock every hero through (free) challenges or pay to unlock them immediately.

If I ever have to play without access to competitive gameplay elements that are paywalled, it's Pay to Win.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

It's still an important distinction to make.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

You can unlock every hero through (free) challenges or pay to unlock them immediately.

Which is a problem in competitive gaming. Mauga proved that when people were leaving comp games to buy the battle pass so they weren't getting obliterated for not having him unlocked yet. So sure it's not totally accurate to say new heroes are locked behind a paywall but the spirt is the same since it's still pay to win for a few weeks.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

And to their credit, they just announced that all new heroes will be free and unlocked for everyone.

But yeah I stopped playing months ago. The Bebop collab intrigued me, but they really dropped the ball with Spike and Ein.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I agree (I am against any monetization model that affects gameplay) but felt like the distinction is significant enough to warrant clarification

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I see your point, but to me there being an alternate way around the paywall (grinding) doesnt make it not a paywall