this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
39 points (100.0% liked)

196

16244 readers
2109 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
39
Android rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Android's file structure is so incomprehensible. I'm genuinely surprised there hasn't been any significant effort made to make it more readable. Pictures saved in app directories, downloads, camera, images, pictures, media, DCIM???.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm genuinely surprised there hasn't been any significant effort made to make it more readable.

Quite the opposite. They've tried to make it better, and in turn, they've made it worse.

They used to have a pretty straightforward Linux file structure, and you were expected to put things in the external Pictures folder. And downloads went to the external Downloads folder. Back then, internal storage was small and SDs were large, so apps couldn't really afford to store these things locally and the SD structure was well enough defined that it was pretty clear where pictures would go.

Now, Google has pushed against SD cards. They also started requiring more permissions for external storage. They've added some "documents" APIs that were supposed to make it easier to tag/find files, but it's a tangled mess and most apps don't touch it. And they've rewritten their storage model multiple times at this point. If you're writing a new app, it's unclear which model to even follow anymore because Google has created a giant cluster fuck of options and paradigms.

Google is actively making this problem worse and worse. I wish they had never tried to "fix" this in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

xkcd “standards” comes to mind

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We don't even have to link the relevant xkcds anymore

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

there was that joke where every joke is already known so instead of telling the joke they just say the number of it.

wonder if we ever get there, someone will just reply, xkcd 375

load more comments (6 replies)