this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
149 points (92.1% liked)

Games

16751 readers
577 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 8 months ago (9 children)

“Dev says”

So it’s not happening then, gotcha

Star Citizen is one of the biggest scams ever in the gaming industry. Stop pumping money into these greedy fucks.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 8 months ago (5 children)

These “scam” comments are getting old.

It’s not a scam in the sense they are deliberately taking your money and not deliver anything in return. I am confident the people at CIG want to create something unique and amazing.

It is a very complex project though and you can argue about if it has been managed properly.

I check this game out once a year maybe, but there are lots of people playing this game daily and enjoying it even in its current alpha state.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

It’s not a scam in the sense they are deliberately taking your money and not deliver anything in return.

The definition of a scam is essentially a trick or deceiving maneuver that someone uses to take advantage of you, usually for their own personal gain.

So if you gave me $5 for oranges and I gave you orange-painted rocks, it's still a scam.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if now they have enough money to refund me the 40usd I spended back then on their kickstarter, when I still believed I could get the next Privateer/Freelancer.

Call it an unintended scam, just like Peter Molyneux.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

I do think that the amount of money people have poured in does show that there is legitimately a lot of consumer demand for a new Freelancer (well, or Wing Commander is maybe more apropos for Star Citizen).

Frankly, I'd rather have one done with minimal assets, and then go back and sell aesthetic DLC packs to make it pretty if people want.

Freelancer scrimped pretty hard on the out-of-cockpit assets. I feel like a lot of newer space games have blown a lot of work on building a pretty world that doesn't add a lot to the actual core flying around and fighting bit, like X4 (particularly relative to earlier games in the series).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

You could've said that in 2015. Now? It's a scam, plain and simple. Give me Squadron 42. All of it, not some bullshit episodic type of release.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago

Let me guess, you’ve put more than $/£40 into the game and want to find ways to justify it?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

In no way in hell is it worth the amount poured into it. Which leads to the only conclusion that the money is being mishandled. Put simpler: it's a scam

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

After watching all of Sunk Cost Galaxy, no one can convince me it’s not a scam.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago

It is not a scam. For it to be a scam there has to be a malicious intention.

Those people are incompetent. That is something different.

load more comments (3 replies)