this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
697 points (92.7% liked)

Memes

45180 readers
1509 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 40 points 6 months ago (9 children)

How come every thread I see about this topic, there is nobody who is concerned about letting the federal government dictate which apps you can and cannot use to communicate with other people? This is some 1984 shit.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 months ago (8 children)

Because it isn't new nor special.

Apps are a Service and services have been and are regulated for decades now and the system have been always arbitrary as fuck.

In the case of TikTok, the west, as a military alliance, should be concerned due to the nature of current valid Chinese laws and the implications of it.

And e.g. facebook has proven that they don't like to stick to rules about how to handle data. In case of TikTok, this could easily have bigger implications for e.g. the American military.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Well, you can expect China doing the same. This kind of behaviour triggers retalliation.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

You might look into the apps they have already banned.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

The current situation over in China still allows internet users to easily access services like Facebook or YouTube through VPNs, it was more of a measure of digital protectionism to allow local development of IT companies, online business, etc. If China wants to do similar censorship in response to these measure, they very well could still crack down on VPNs.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

They were blocking the bulk of the internet via their great firewall before mobile apps were even a thing

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)