this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
165 points (97.7% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3689 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Remember to make some popcorn for when you read the comments here. Lemmy and discussing communism is like watching two programmers argue over vim and emacs.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What's there to even argue about.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Is Emacs lisp better, or vim's scripting language?
Do you prefer C-x, or ^c:q?

And other such arguments over which one is apparently better than the other.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No, the real argument is Tabs vs Spaces.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I never even considered Tabs until watching that episode of Silicon Valley but now I know that Spaces is objectively wrong.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

That episode completely missed the point. No one is arguing about pressing the tab key vs pressing the spacebar 4 times. It is purely about whether the tab key inserts a tab character, \t, or a series of spaces.

There are valid arguments both ways. But if you want to piss me off, mix the two!

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

He can't even define 'woke'.

I'd say I want to know what his definition of communism is but it's clear he means the same thing as when he says 'woke'.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

He absolutely can define woke, because his administration did so in court:

the belief there are systemic injustices in American society and the need to address them

They just refuse to admit it actually exists.