arbitrary_sarcasm

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 41 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Yes honey, I'm almost there.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What an absolutely braindead comment.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Now I fully agree that marital rape should definitely have the same repercussions as rape. However, the summary posted made me think initially that there was no protection for women against domestic violence in India at all.

After some googling, I found some more context

“It is submitted that the act colloquially referred to as ‘marital rape’ ought to be illegal and criminalised. The Central Government asserts that a woman’s consent is not obliterated by marriage, and its violation should result in penal consequences. However, the consequences of such violations within marriage differ from those outside it. Parliament has provided different remedies, including criminal law provisions, to protect consent within marriage. Sections 354, 354A, 354B, 498A IPC, and the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, ensure serious penal consequences for such violations,”

Tl;dr marital rape is illegal and can be prosecuted. But somehow the court thinks that the act of marriage changes the situation.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Loudermilk had an episode on this.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

In my field of research, there seems to be a recent push for artifact evaluation. It's a separate process which is also optional but you get to brag about the fact that you get badges if your experiment results were replicated.

There's also some push back against this since it's additional work, but I think it's a step in the right direction.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I doubt that. The second part of the name is the exact same word written in Hindi. And satt is a root word that means truth in hindi

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

Yeah those dead toddlers were definitely hamas. /s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

I don't think I ever claimed that. In fact, I don't think anyone in this thread claimed that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I can give you personal examples that contradict both your arguments. Also, I don't know what Rae numbers are but the fact that Americans are moving to Europe is provided in this article : https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/02/travel/travel-news-us-families-relocate-europe/index.html

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (4 children)

And 99% of Americans aren't moving. But the few that are moving, are doing so because they don't wanna be in that 1%

6
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
view more: next ›