this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Death to NATO

1551 readers
4 users here now

For posting news about NATO's wars in Ukraine, Serbia, Kosovo, and The Middle East, including anywhere else NATO is currently engaged in hostile actions. As well as anything that relates to it.

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

NATO in reality is far weaker than the SCO in all direct military comparisons. Apart from the already weakened, debt-burdened and militarily wildly overstretched US, the only significant land military power NATO has is medium-sized Turkiye. The SCO, in contrast, can boast of four major thermonuclear military powers all of which have formidable land armies — China, Russia, India and Iran. Turkiye itself, as I have noted, now appears happier associating with the SCO than with NATO.

That's a very interesting perspective; not considered a comparison of the SCO with NATO before.

If one hasn't seen it already Vijay Prashad's take is also interesting - *Hyperimperialism: US-NATO’s Dangerous and Decadent New Stage *

https://youtube.com/watch?v=CJDxxkVhlJM

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Actually no because Frankenstein's monster was not evil, just misunderstood, meanwhile, NATO isn't not evil, just misunderstood (by liberals).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's not misunderstood either. It's evil and understood. They know what side their bread is buttered, it's the imperialism side. It's just that their narcissism won't allow them to openly admit it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Frankenstein's monster did in fact make a conscious decision to be evil

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Dr. Frankstein deserved to have his life ruined, but it came at the cost of many innocent people dying

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

He could have done that by following Frankenstein and scaring people away instead of killing

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Eh, it just wanted to ruin some terrible dude’s life and get revenge. Critical support for a nonbinary icon.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (11 children)

Well, thanks china daily for what I’m sure is a totally unbiased serious news piece!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

While this isn't really important, but the author of this piece is Martin Sieff, who I did not know until you made this comment. Here's are short bios of him:

Basically he is from Northern Ireland, studied in British universities, worked in US media, connected to Russia, contributes to Chinese media. I think all this background information is too much for some to process.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

there is no such thing as an unbiased news piece. that you believe otherwise is honestly embarrassing assuming you're not a child

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Yeah, how dare non-western countries have their own perspective on things! Rude!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Ask yourself this: when was the last time the US didn't lie you into war?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

says the dude who probably thinks CNN is trustworthy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Imagine living with your head in the sand.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

I'm sure you have the same attitude towards what your MSM says about China?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

In Communist Badcountry, the citizens are trained to immediately, aggressively dismiss any information from Beyond the Border that runs counter to the nationalist propaganda they're fed on a daily basis. yeonmi-park

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Actually with new members Finland and Sweden, N.A.T.O. is now more relevant than ever. Should the U.S. role become less significant, its existence and viability are more assured than ever.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Agreed, NATO is now a bigger terrorist than ever before (which is big news- as NATO has always been the greatest and most aggressive terrorist in history). And NATO is a bigger target than before, as well, for when justice finally comes, if they are foolish enough to call it upon themselves (which sadly I am certain they are).

Now formerly ostensibly "neutral" Finland and Sweden have secured their fate. Who's next to sign up to the Nazi-Atlantic Terrorist Organization? Who else wants to get their countries turned into an irradiated hellhole? If the Europeans want to goosestep their way to hell, then so be it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

pretty sure NATO is just the subjugation of vassal states that will probably collapse before the US does but definitely will after

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Relevant in the sense of being an imperialist danger to all life on earth, sure. Also, bear in mind NATO does not provide any benefit to members, it's a big financial drain, and basically undermines the nation's sovereignty by ceding certain political and military controls to a foreign non-state organization. The fact that NATO itself is a deliberate hard power tool of the US to subordinate Europe and Russia -- a tool that should have been dismantled back in 1992 at the very least, says a lot about its future if the US did exit. Pretty sure any president who tried to leave would get JFK'd before writing the draft.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Well if Trump gets elected you are talking about him.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sorry libshite, that gamble won't work.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes, we are republicans, we support the Soviet Republics, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the People's Republic of China, and the Irish Republican Army.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

i feel sorry for the fact you support a system that is currently in the process of destroying all life on Earth, but oh well, right?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

No offense, Republiturd sounds at lot like the r.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

If some president tries to dismantle NATO they are gonna get JFK'd faster than you can say... well, anything.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Lot of people who don’t care about reality and mild their minds around propaganda believes that. In fact, trump has never said (more than macron) that US would quit/dispose/whatever NATO (as if he could do it, even willing it). What he did was to ask for Europe to put more money on the table.., which since at least one year they already did (he was asking for 2% Europe PBI, he has that and more)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

And Obama ended the invasion of Afghanistan and closed down Guantanimo? I don't get to vote for or against these sociopaths, but I promise I won't whine about anyone who actually tries dismantle NATO.