this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
148 points (81.6% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4479 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Political apathy.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I want to retire. I am sick of this country being run by workaholics. I want it to be run by people planning on not working themselves into the fucking grave, and expecting the rest of us to do so as well.

57 years is the oldest a candidate should be for a first-term presidency. 61 for a second term. If they still want to play politics, they can take a position in their local HOA.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Nah. It's all good 👍. Just find a young candidate next time. Like 30 years old please. If it's another 70 year old white guy, I'm gonna be royally pissed for sure.

Right now I'm just annoyed so I'm not leaving my job just to get shot by the police as they are trained to do.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Minimum age to be president is 35, it would take an amendment to change that, and if we are going to burn the resources to get an amendment passed that's way down the list of things we need to fix.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Because it is largely disinformation and people are being paid to write articles on it or claim such behind closed doors but not publicly

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

um because folks like me are fine with him as the rep and I don't see any replacement as being any more viable.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The last time we filled the streets we wanted police reform and didn't get it.

The time before that it was to protest a war that happened anyway.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not only did we not get police reform, we got a cop as a democratic vice president.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Yes, top cop Kamala. And now they’re threatening to roll with her if Biden has to step down. We’re doomed.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Because, as the sitting President, the only person who can make that decision is Biden. It literally does not matter what anyone else says or does.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago

Only disinformation campaigns, brought to us by Republicans and Russia are calling for it

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Because in no case where they switched candidates in the process did they win an election.

None. It's certain defeat.

Now, if someone would tell these people trying to nullify the vote to kindly fuck off, that'd be great.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 64 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I mean, they packed university campuses across the country and then the riot police went in. What kind of goldfish memory is this?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

They're asking why democrats aren't in the streets though. Democrats were largely against those campus protests since they were perceived as harmful to Biden's reelection chances.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Because those demanding it are few and wealthy and the media is carrying their water?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›