this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
28 points (88.9% liked)

Technology

58144 readers
4513 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Lately (few months) YouTube will not load whatsoever on my android phone nor tablet very often, activating a VPN fixes it instantly. Using basic YouTube app

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Likely just a network-related issue

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Using a VPN on a shitty network won't magically make your network connection better.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It is possible. Maybe the peering from his ISP to YouTube is shit/ overloaded. That was an issue for Deutsche Telekom for a few years because Telekom didn't want to pay for better peering. With a VPN it is possible to get good peering to your ISP and YouTube and in return faster load speeds.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

No, but it does affect what route your traffic goes through.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's an antitrust case if ever I saw one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

EU be like: aw shit here we go again

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I wonder how long it'll be before google gets sued for their anti-competitive behavior.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Oh I imagine the papers are being filed as we speak, because this is blatantly illegal.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (3 children)

What law are they breaking? Not trying to defend Google or anything, just curious what law is blatantly being broken here because I don't know of one

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's an anti competition law, they cannot penalize you for using a competitor service. This would be like getting fined by McDonald's because I went to Taco Bell.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

see FTC anticompetitive-practices

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Blatantly anticompetitive behavior where you (ab)use your dominance in one sector (i.e. YouTube) to choke out competition in another (i.e. make it slow on competing browsers) is illegal in the US and the EU, at the very least. I don't know the specific laws or acts in play, but that's the sort of thing that triggers antitrust lawsuits

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not that I think Google is a great company, but why is this on its own proof of anything based on this single persons video evidence? In my single person test I don't see that 5 second delay when using Firefox and browsing around Youtube. Seems far more likely to be an issue with this persons browser setup than something Google did to me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And this is precisely why they use an A/B architecture to implement these sorts of changes. "It's not happening on mine, must be in your setup." delays/prevents people from recognizing the bad behavior, and instead of them being called out on it or forced to behave properly, the users they abuse just give up and switch back to Chrome because it "works better", then the A/B lists are shuffled again and the process repeats.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Or, they could use an A/B architecture because it makes good design sense when you are dealing with a change that will impact millions/billions of people. But the conspiracy theory's sure are a lot more fun to wallow in I will admit.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

Or, they could use an A/B architecture because it makes good design sense when you are dealing with a change that will impact millions/billions of people.

Both could be true though.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"Conspiracy theory is sure are a lot more fun to wallow in". Did you miss the recent youtube adblock shenanigans? Do you think google is your friend? Are you aware discord is google adservices integrated? Are you under the impression google wouldn't do something like this to leverage more data from people using one of their sites? Are you unfamiliar with the recent and upcoming OTHER changes to make chrome less friendly? Do you know about google AMP? You're defending a corporation and not an individual here, really take time to consider what you're calling conspiracy theory is (the plural is theories)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

A company doing shitty things does not mean everything you don't like that comes out of them is some mustache twirling villain plot. You should spend more time in the real world and less time in the Lemmy/Reddit echo chamber.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I feel compelled to come back to this thread and eat my crow. Apparently they were doing it to fuck with people, just not Firefox people specifically,lol.

https://lemmy.world/post/8539705

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

I feel compelled to come back to this thread and eat my crow.

Thank you for doing this. If more people owned up to their mistakes and corrected them, things would be a lot better.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

Fuck Google

load more comments
view more: next ›