this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
514 points (97.9% liked)

Gaming

19728 readers
588 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

I've got 15 hours in it and have played all weekend.

There are some performance issues, but overall, I've had a blast playing it.

All of the game content is accessible for the sticker price you paid, so yeah, I couldn't care less about the microtransaction aspect of things.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Saw this game on PS5 and was about to get it when I saw all the "packs" and other bull shit. Noped right out.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

The original dragons dogma had poor quality of life features and its arguably a large part of the appeal. No fast travel, no multiple saves. If you didn’t like your little ai character you had to advance pretty far to change it (and the same with fast travel, it sort of existed and was a surprisingly cool unique system but you had to get through a lot of the game for it). I’d compare it in a lot of ways to the first dark souls as far as not following gaming industry trends.

I was hoping dragons dogma 2 was more of the same honestly, I don’t think I care if travel stones can be purchased or whatever. Is it a bad game for those that liked the first one?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago

I think the hate is them essentially selling a difficulty slider.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Been playing it since release and I have to say I quite like it. The mtx is less intrusive than Dragon Age Origins' DLC (no mention in game at all versus "There's a person bleeding out on the road, if you want to help him please go to the store page").

So far, the game is a buttery smooth 60 fps at 4k max graphics + FSR3 w/o ray tracing except for inside the capital city (running 7800x3d with a 7900xtx). The only graphics complaint I have is the FSR implementation is pretty bad, with small amounts of ghosting under certain lighting conditions. There's also a noticeable amount of input lag compared to the first game: not game breaking, but if you do a side-by-side comparison it's pretty obvious.

Sure the game has its issues, but right now this looks like something that I enjoy. Games don't need to be masterworks to be fun (my favorite games are some old niche JRPGs that have been absolutely demolished by reviewers at the time), and right now I think it's money well spent.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

I’ll most likely end up picking it up and I’m glad it runs well. The reception has been wild to me. I loved all the jankiness of dragon’s dogma but I feel like a lot of people are buying this sequel and not knowing what to expect

[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

It sucks that micro transactions exist at all, but I've been playing the game and haven't even opened the store at all, and the game seems pretty good. Is there any actual negativity on the actual game play, or is all the negativity sorry about the micro transactions? Because if that's the only drawback, then that's not really that bad.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

My personal complaints (despite enjoying the gameplay):

  1. Input lag. It's negligible compared to other games, but comparing it to DDDA it feels much higher (meh vs "oh wow this is smooth!")

  2. FSR. There is definitely something wrong with the FSR implementation here, because there are minor traces of ghosting that are not present in other games. Rotate your character in the character selection screen, or look at a pillar with water as the backdrop with light rays nearby. That being said, it becomes less obvious during actual gameplay. I do hope that this will be fixed though.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

I like RPG games, however I don't like it when the company has the ability and incentive to bate and switch my game into a worse version after I bought it.

Denuvo forces me to be connected to the internet, which makes playing the game on the move difficult or even impossible. It also allows them to make sure that the most current version is played. MTX means they don't have incentives to fix the game and instead sell you the fixes, or even enshittyfy it, to squeeze out more money.

This gives me the incentive to wait a couple of years, until the game doesn't receive any updates anymore, and then decide if the final product is worth it. And hope that I will get a good experience out of it, before the Denuvo activation servers are shut down.

So you have to wait for a few years, in order to know if the gameplay is (and stays) any good.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

A lot of players were having crashing on startup or during character creator, so that could account for some valid criticism. But from those who have it running well (according to two of my buddies so totally anecdotal) the gameplay is pretty great.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

I had heard PC was having some issues with that, but to be honest, that's nearly every release these days. But I can understand why it might be frustrating.

load more comments
view more: next ›