this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
620 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

58144 readers
4513 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 211 points 7 months ago (59 children)

Who could've imagined that Google is becoming just as mediocre and boring as any other large corporation. What a surprise!

[–] [email protected] 34 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I am old enough to remember that Apple was the pirate of Silicon Valley, and then it became the most “cooperation” company in the industry. Then it’s Google then there will be a next one. It’s probably inevitable for any company to go this route.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

It's a well travelled path for any company in the tech sphere. Start out as a disruptor and breath of fresh air in a stagnant industry and then slowly crank the dial toward enshittification over time hoping that the reputation you previously built will keep your customer base from jumping ship too quickly.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Unregulated capitalism ruins everything if given enough time.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's cute that you think any new corporation of that calibre will be born in near future. It will get bought out before that happens

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

It be the age of pirates no morrre? Arr... :C

load more comments (55 replies)