slakemoth

Russian bribes, Israeli bribes, saudi bribes, private healthcare bribes

Which MPs dont take bribes ? I know one but he was deemed unelectable by the commentari

Labour continue to show that they are no different from the Tories.

How many of their major decisions have been different from Tory policy making?

But thank god they were so electable!

Also worth remembering that Lenin wanted Russia to lose ww1 (ie lose to a literal dictator) - having a critical stance against the military activities of your own government is not sucking up to a dictator which your own capitalist government has decided to make an enemy

Dude if you want to be a socialist you cant be pro nato as well. Nato's entire raison d'être is to protect capitalism.

I would give up my lunch money if it meant not getting into a brawl.

If the mafia shakes you down every week, you dont snitch to the cops, because the cops can only make more violence. Its the same principle here. You won't get out of this situation with more war.

War is shit for people who live through it. Nato is only good for making war. On dearming can stop war.

Well why don't you fucking volunteer to go Ukraine then if its so important.

I'll tend your wounds when you're home sweetie

I'd rather be nuked than join the military

The Uk is between a rock and hard place geopolitically. It seems that joining the eu is political suicide but aligning economically with the Usa means selling off the nhs.

I guess the best we can hope for is going our own way and hoping for some economic miracle . Maybe we'll discover some more north sea oil....

Im not sure what you're referring to but i do know that USA has been interfering in the Ukraine which Russia considers its backyard. Imagine if Russia started arming and funding militias in alaska or mexico? (I know you're probably going to bring up Russian bots but that isnt the same, and the USA does that kind of shit all the time).

Would we have had a couple hundred thousand dead if we hadn't armed Ukrainian military? No the war would have ended if Russia just took the corridor it seems to want. If Russia had taken the whole country there would have been many resistance fighters but nowhere near the scale we've seen.

In any case , while we've been talking the russian minister at the talks with trump has said they wont accept peacekeeping forces anyway. So this is all futile speculation. There won't be peacekeeping forces unless you want to prolong the war.

The USA invaded iraq - they didn't have any intention of making it sovereign territory. That's not enough evidence of intent.

Yes i also did gcse history and learnt about Chamberlain

Perhaps we could avoid war instead by making Russia a geopolitical ally rather than continually making them an enemy? Its not like we have any trouble making strategic alliances with other disreputable states.

No this chat by starmer is sabre rattling stupidity , what i dont fully understand is why they do it. The USA will be taking all the spoils from this war.

Any evidence for this?