this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
115 points (96.0% liked)

World News

39096 readers
2490 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The taped banana - now perhaps one of the most expensive fruits ever sold - was actually bought earlier in the day for a mere $0.35, according to the New York Times.

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Traditional art was just NFTs all along.
🌍🧑‍🚀🔫🧑‍🚀

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You mean it's all money laundering?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dude I put that on a tee for you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago

Ah-ha! Now you have missed the meme reply!
Check and mate. 😏

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I too have a nearly perfect replica of this piece. I'm selling each piece, which is part of an extremely limited run of 1000 pieces in total produced this week on demand, signed and sealed in a Tupperware container for freshness, for $2,990 each, worldwide shipping is just another $299.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I'd be willing to sell it for $299 with $29 shipping, what a steal!

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It's really just one of a limited number of licenses which allows the owner of the license to showcase the work and legally regard it as an official work from the artist who first came up with the idea. Anyone can tape a banana to a wall, but only a few can do so and say that it's an 'original'.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)
  • who gives a shit if it's original or derivative
  • Tape a different fruit and it's now a new original
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I agree, it's very absurd, and that's part of the point. It's also obvious too that someone gives a shit since they're willing to shell out millions of dollars for it. And as far as taping another piece of fruit to the wall, it unlikely to do well because with modern and conceptual art, it's all about who came up with the idea first.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Do this as an institution you'll get nuked in court.

Do this as an individual nobody will pay to see it.

The more you complain the more it's worth.

People pay money to see it because it's controversial.

That's why it's art.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

That's why I consider AI art actually art.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know if I can trust the license. Any way to make it burn a ton of electricity to function?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

We'll do I have a bridge to sell you!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You cannot stop idiots from being stupid.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

Actually we are the idiots, because we just let them launder money

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I might be splitting hairs, but it’s appeal.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's a pun. A peel, like the skin on a banana.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As was mine, albeit a poor one.

Splitting as in banana split.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well it seems the puns come in bunches.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Is the banana for scale?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

The rich need more money laundering vehicles.

[–] [email protected] 105 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

The fact that it was bought by a crypto "entrepreneur" pretty much confirms it.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For real. If I really wanted the "art" I wouldn't have to spend more than $15. $5 for a roll of duct tape, $10 for a banana.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

I see what you did there

[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Yo I was about to comment this.

Like literally.

How do you transfer a huge amount of money.

Just get the receipient to create "art"

Instruct receipient to sell "art" for the amount of money

Voila, legal money laundering!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Was commonplace in vanilla wow, you would see common items in the Auction House selling for silly prices - those were the players buying gold. Washing it via the auction house making it seem more legitimate.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't understand how buying art with 6.2 m in cash is not going to be suspicious though?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Because you “can’t put a price on art”. Assuming there’s a sales tax or something for the sale, it’s pretty much a legit sale.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah, it's the first thing I thought. Everybody else sees it too, right? This is well past dadaism.

...but wasn't this the case all along in the art market, except for institutional buyers?