this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
107 points (95.7% liked)

Asklemmy

45330 readers
1083 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm just wondering, because I have seen some negative comments on here about him, but they don't usually provide specifics.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

I respect the effort he's put into right to repair, and agree (in general) with most of the points he makes about it.

But I also think he's an asshole and we need a better voice for the RtR movement. I've seen him get into fights and strawman people on reddit as corporate shills just for calling his attitude abrasive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

"Source available" grifter.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 days ago

He's doing some really good stuff for right to repair; he get's a bit overly dramatic sometimes but you can tell that he's just very passionate about those things.

I think he's the best type of influencer; rather than money or fame he strives for an end to the constant enshittification by exposing bad actors and not giving a shit about it.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

He fights the good fight but I don't like his videos very much because he's very whiny and annoying.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Lol, him screaming quietly pisses me off.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (3 children)

wow not a single mention of how he has a Kiwi Farms account in the comments here, surprising

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Where might one find more information on this?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

I was wondering this is well. Took me a while to find this discussion: https://woem.men/notes/9ozhpn3l2n5v0b6c

He claims he only created an account to "investigate" if they were talking about him.

Another worrying thing I accidentally stumbled on a while back was he was in the streamer "Destiny" chat. Hmm: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgF92Wi8J7o (said he used to listen to Jordan Peterson in 2015 too).

Yeah, IDK what to think about him now. I still like his consumer advocacy though, I guess.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I long wondered how he manages to identify as a libertarian despite what he spends all his time talking about, now it's starting to make more sense lol

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Soo, what? Does he actively participate in harassment?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This comment shows your stripes..

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

And this comment shows you have no evidence.

Yes, he has an account, but looking at his post history, the only thing he did was reply several times in a single thread mentioning he is leaving NY for Texas.

Did my own research.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 3 days ago

I think I agree with most comments here.

He's usually right and I agree with him, I just find him a little hard to watch. His videos are a bit long winded.

I 100% support him. I think his heart and mind are in the right place.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

good, but man his videos on the SteamDeck are really over negative for no reason. For someone who really supports Linux he doesn't seem to much appreciate the thing getting Linux to mainstream popularity

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

We are allowed to guide the growth of things and show where they need work.

Didn't you people have report cards?

[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 days ago

His board repair videos were outstanding. I don't especially enjoy his rants. He's usually right, but I don't really care to listen to how mad he is about it. I can get mad on my own.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago

He’s fine. His videos come off as a bit whiny. The stance of pirating content as being justified instead of just abstaining from an unsatisfactory service seems entitled to me but I get it. I think he’s mostly right in his analysis of things, I don’t make it through every video that he posts though

[–] [email protected] 35 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I tend to like him and the things he has to say. I like that he helps consumers be more conscious of the things they buy, and cautions against companies with bad practices (such as those that are closed sourced, or lock basic features behind paywalls, etc).

He strikes me as a little socially awkward himself, and maybe that manifests as his rage at some of these companies and situations; he could stand to take a breath every now and then. I really enjoyed his breakdown of the Honey scam and LTT.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He’s autistic, that’s why he’s socially awkward. It was mentioned in one of his videos a few years ago.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Clearly I missed that video. Thanks for letting me know! That makes his views and attitudes make a little more sense.

(I also didn't mean socially awkward as an insult or anything, I certainly have no room to talk)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

I’m socially awkward, but that’s probably just paranoia and PTSD from my time in the military.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 days ago

I don’t like him. He’s angry at everything and his videos are a chore to watch. I also feel like he’s sometimes a bit out of touch (I don’t like ads or paying for digital content either, but if no one pays for it, it‘ll stop existing) and a bit pessimistic (yes, companies aren’t your friends, but not everything you perceive as negative is done out of malice, sometimes people are just not thinking stuff through).

However, I do appreciate him as a right to repair activist.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

He's mostly correct about lots of things, but not about everything (for example, he hated on everything GrapheneOS just because its lead dev is a bit socially awkward). Plus he's overly dramatic and verbose which can be annoying. Sometimes you must be to get abstract or complicated points across better, but I still feel he's too aggressive in that regard. I also like what he's trying to achieve with FUTO in general. Overall, he's a great and valuable activist who has almost all of his eggs in the right baskets.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He said he wasn't going to use GrapheneOS anymore because Daniel Micay threatened to blackmail him because Rossman had made a comment on a video describing his behavior online.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

The dev threatened to "expose" him for supposedly supporting people swatting his house.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I know this is a Louis Rossman thread but calling Daniel Micay "a bit socially awkward" is minimizing the issue to an extreme. Louis Rossman made his comments after he watched Techlore's in-depth video documenting Daniel's behavior, but keep in mind that even that hour-long video is just scratching the surface. To this day, Daniel continues to act the same way if not worse, and has a giant list of "enemies" that he says are attacking, harassing, bullying, and gangstalking the "grapheneOS project" (aka him). This might be partially caused by him bashing other open source projects and making new enemies any chance he gets. I'm not sure when the "all open source projects get together to personally target Daniel Micay" meetings occur, but maybe the only common thread is Daniel himself. There are tons and tons of receipts out there on the web if you search for "Daniel Micay list of enemies", especially on a site that I don't feel comfortable promoting but which does a very good job of keeping track of this stuff - especially because Daniel always deletes everything incriminating afterwards. If you're going to catch him in the act you need to take screenshots and make archive.org snapshots.

Daniel's behavior is a very important issue to be aware of if you're considering using grapheneOS, and personally it crosses the line of what I feel comfortable with in regards to running his operating system on the most personal device I have. Louis Rossman was even more justified in his decision to do the same, since Daniel is (to this day) specifically targeting him.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't view it as badly. He's probably overly defensive and paranoid and interprets some forms of criticism as attacks. But I do not see this as an argument against his competence or contributions to the project, or against using GrapheneOS altogether, at all. In fact, I even kind of like having someone paranoid as the head of a security-focused OS. Seems like a useful synergy to me. Also, AFAIK the GrapheneOS project now also has others posting about the project, not just him alone. I think this was also a result of his "miscommunication" in the past. Furthermore, the project is too important (there are almost zero high-security and high-privacy mobile OSes!) to escalate this into a problem. And furthermore again, there might also be parties involved who are ACTUALLY interested in attacking GrapheneOS and weakening its popularity, for their own gains. And so when your successful and also high-quality project is under regular attacks from various angles, you might get more paranoid and misinterpret some valid criticism as a result. Combine that with Rossman's over-dramatic nature and high reach, and someone paranoid like Daniel might take it the wrong way. And then communication spirals out of control into various escalations. At least that's how I interpret it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

He’s probably overly defensive and paranoid and interprets some forms of criticism as attacks.

I think this was also a result of his “miscommunication” in the past

there might also be parties involved who are ACTUALLY interested in attacking GrapheneOS and weakening its popularity, for their own gains.

when your successful and also high-quality project is under regular attacks from various angles

Rossman’s over-dramatic nature and high reach

then communication spirals out of control into various escalations

You should actually look at any of the copious amounts of evidence that involve this conversation instead of just imagining what it might look like. There's really not much else to talk about until you do. Daniel has given us zero evidence to support his side, while in contrast there's a mountain of evidence against him.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

its lead dev is a bit socially awkward

Heh. You're being gentle, and that's good. But that's maybe understating it a bit.

I've seen the GrapheneOS official Mastodon account being an antisocial uncollegial mess.

It's okay to acknowledge that we wish some of our open source contributors were better community members.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Out of interest (because I know nothing whatsoever about GrapheneOS), how does its lead compare to Linus Torvald?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

I don't follow either closely enough to make a rank list or anything.

In the same ballpark as some moments that Torvalds has apologized for. Milder than Torvald's worst, but also unrepentant, as far as I've seen.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

He's very annoying to listen to.

[–] [email protected] 110 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In short, like anyone else:

He's absolutely right, and utterly annoying

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Seems intelligent and I've enjoyed some of his videos. I don't know much about him other than he's a bit... intense? and he's sparked controversy with some people. I looove the FUTO keyboard app he's associated with. It's the best TTS keyboard I've found, and I refuse to use the Google/Samsung/etc equivalents

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The TTS uses whisper and absolutely dominates. But it is garbage still as a swipe interface. It direly needs to catch up on that front before I can recommend it full-time to friends. I spend SO much time retyping things it gets wrong.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

If you're looking for a reasonable FOSS swipe keyboard, try AnySoftKeyboard. While still a step below the non FOSS keyboards I've used before like Swiftkey, it gets the job done reasonably well

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago

Also the Grayjay app.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Great consumer rights activist and I have agreed with 90% of the takes I've heard from him, but his videos are mind numbingly long and boring.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I was just saying the other day it feels like he gets through all that needs to be said in the first half of the video and then spends the rest ranting/reiterating himself. But I think he has good talking points

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

First half is generous imho. From the one I just watched it felt like 3/4 was spent rehashing the same thing over and over.

load more comments
view more: next ›